Supercarrier 2017-11-28T15:34:11+00:00


Supercarrier is an unofficial descriptive term for the largest type of aircraft carrier, typically those displacing over 70,000 short tons (64,000 metric tons).[1] Supercarriers are the largest warships ever built, larger than the largest battleship class laid down by any country. The United States Navy has ten active supercarriers as of 2015,[2] while the United Kingdom will have two—the Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers[3]Queen Elizabeth and the second Prince of Wales which are currently being built, and are expected to enter service in 2018.[4][5]

Outside the US, there are more light carriers closer to 30,000 tons, such as Italy’s Cavour. A few countries operate medium-sized fleet carriers of around 40,000 tons, such as the French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle.

Read more about the US Navy Supercarrier fleet:

US CVN-77 George H.W. Bush | Nimitz-Class

US CVN-76 Ronald Regan | Nimitz-Class

US CVN-75 Harry S. Truman | Nimitz Class

US CVN-74 John C. Stennis | Nimitz-Class

US CVN-73 George Washington | Nimitz-Class

US CVN-72 Abraham Lincoln | Nimitz-Class

US CVN-71 Theodore Roosevelt | Nimitz-Class

US CVN-70 Carl Vinson | Nimitz-Class

US CVN-69 Dwight D. Eisenhower

US CVN-68 Nimitz | Nimitz-Class



The first ship to be described by The New York Times as a supercarrier was HMS Ark Royal in 1938,[6]with a length of 685 feet (209 m) and a displacement of 22,000 tons, designed to carry 72 aircraft.[7][8] In 1943 the superlative was transferred to the 45,000-ton Midway-class carriers as a step-up from the 27,000-ton Essex class.[9] The Japanese aircraft carrier Shinano, launched in 1944, was the first aircraft carrier with a standard displacement of over 65,000 metric tons.

The post-war standard for supercarriers was set by the proposed USS United States and USS Forrestal.[10]Forrestal displaced 60,000 tons standard and 78,000 tons in deep load[11] and is considered the first operational supercarrier in the present-day sense, as used by the US press.[12] The similar-sized United States would have been in service earlier, had it been completed; its cancellation triggered the “Revolt of the Admirals”.

The Soviet Union’s 85,000-ton nuclear carrier Ulyanovsk, closely comparable in size to earlier American supercarriers, was 40% complete when it and a follow-on vessel were canceled in 1991 during post-Cold War funding cuts.

As of 2015 the United Kingdom has one 70,000-ton Queen Elizabeth-class carrier being fitted out, and another under construction,[13] and France had until 2013 been considering building one vessel based on the same design. These ships are referred to as supercarriers by British legislators[14][15][16][17] and the news media.[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] The two Queen Elizabeth-class carriers will provide the Royal Navy with capabilities much closer to United States Navy carriers than the Invincible-class vessels retired in 2014. Giving evidence to the House of Commons Defence Committee in 2004, the First Sea Lord Alan West, Baron West of Spithead explained that interoperability with the United States Navy was as much a deciding factor of the size of the carriers as the firepower of the carrier’s airwing:

I have talked with the CNO (Chief of Naval Operations) in America. He is very keen for us to get these because he sees us slotting in with his carrier groups. He really wants us to have these, but he wants us to have the same sort of clout as one of their carriers.[25]

Future plans for supercarriers in the United States involve the construction of the U.S. Navy’s next generation of carriers, the Gerald R. Ford class, which will have a 100,000-ton displacement.


The United States maintains ten of these ships, with each typically operating 45 McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet aircraft for traditional fighter, attack and electronic countermeasure roles with twelve Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk helicopters, four Northrop Grumman E-2 Hawkeye airborne early warning and control aircraft and two Grumman C-2 Greyhound carrier onboard delivery aircraft.[26] Given carriers’ vulnerability in combat and to peacetime asymmetrical warfare attacks, the use of more and smaller carriers rather than large vessels has been suggested over the years, such as Elmo Zumwalt’s Sea Control Ship, and carriers the size of USS America carrying STOVL aircraft and Unmanned combat aerial vehicle.[27][28][29] However, supercarrier advocates consider them to be more cost-effective than a larger number of smaller carriers.[30] An American carrier strike group costs $25 million per week for routine operations, rising to $40 million during combat operations.[31]

The mobile offshore base (MOB) is an extension of the supercarrier concept, a modular floating military base as large as 10 aircraft carriers. If realized, it could be moved anywhere throughout the world’s oceans, obviating the need to seek permission from allied nations for use of land bases. The concept was studied in the 1990s by the U.S. government but was abandoned in 2001 as cost prohibitive.


  • United States Forrestal class (1955): Four unit class, all decommissioned
  • United States Kitty Hawk class (1961): Four unit class, all decommissioned
  • United States Enterprise class (1961): Six unit class, five cancelled, one decommissioned
  • United States Nimitz class (1975): 10 unit class, all active
  • United States Gerald R. Ford class (2016): 10 unit class, two under construction, one ordered, 7 planned
  • United Kingdom Queen Elizabeth class (2016): Two unit class, one being fitted out, the other under construction


  • United States United States class (1950s): Five planned, one laid down, all cancelled
  • United Kingdom CVA-01 (1960s): Two planned, both cancelled
  • Soviet Union Project 1153 OREL (1970s): Cancelled
  • Soviet Union Ulyanovsk class (1990s): Two planned, one partially completed, all cancelled
  • France Porte-Avions 2 (2010s): One planned, cancelled


  • Russia Shtorm – 90,000-100,000 Ton displacement (estimate – under design)[32]

Supercarriers in service

CountryName (Hull number)LengthTonnage (mt)ClassPropulsionTypeCommission
 US Nimitz (CVN-68)333 m (1,093 ft)100,020 mtNimitzNuclearCATOBAR3 May 1975
 US Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69)333 m (1,093 ft)103,200 mtNimitzNuclearCATOBAR18 October 1977
 US Carl Vinson (CVN-70)333 m (1,093 ft)102,900 mtNimitzNuclearCATOBAR13 March 1982
 US Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71)333 m (1,093 ft)106,300 mtNimitzNuclearCATOBAR25 October 1986
 US Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72)333 m (1,093 ft)105,783 mtNimitzNuclearCATOBAR11 November 1989
 US George Washington (CVN-73)333 m (1,093 ft)105,900 mtNimitzNuclearCATOBAR4 July 1992
 US John C. Stennis (CVN-74)333 m (1,093 ft)105,000 mtNimitzNuclearCATOBAR9 December 1995
 US Harry S. Truman (CVN-75)333 m (1,093 ft)105,600 mtNimitzNuclearCATOBAR25 July 1998
 US Ronald Reagan (CVN-76)333 m (1,093 ft)103,000 mtNimitzNuclearCATOBAR12 July 2003
 US George H.W. Bush (CVN-77)333 m (1,093 ft)104,000 mtNimitzNuclearCATOBAR10 January 2009


Supercarriers under construction or being fitted out

CountryName (Hull number)LengthTonnageClassPropulsionTypeCommission dateStatus
 UK Queen Elizabeth (R08)[33]280 m (920 ft)70,600 mt[34]Queen ElizabethConventionalSTOVL2017 (expected)[35]Being fitted out
 UK Prince of Wales (R09)[33]280 m (920 ft)70,600 mtQueen ElizabethConventionalSTOVL2020 (expected)Under construction
 US Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78)[36]337 m (1,106 ft)102,000 mtGerald R. FordNuclearCATOBAR2016 (expected)Being fitted out
 US John F. Kennedy (CVN-79)[37]337 m (1,106 ft)102,000 mtGerald R. FordNuclearCATOBAR2020 (expected)Under construction